{"id":4034,"date":"2022-10-12T11:31:29","date_gmt":"2022-10-12T09:31:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/?p=4034"},"modified":"2022-10-12T11:31:29","modified_gmt":"2022-10-12T09:31:29","slug":"eine-zweite-chance-fuer-die-pannenwahl-vom-26-september-2021-wie-wuerde-das-verfahren-aussehen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/2022\/10\/12\/eine-zweite-chance-fuer-die-pannenwahl-vom-26-september-2021-wie-wuerde-das-verfahren-aussehen\/","title":{"rendered":"A second chance for the erroneous Berlin elections of September 26, 2021? What would the procedure look like?\u202f\u202f\u202f \u202f"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4036 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/221012-blogbeitrag-neuwahlen-in-berlin-canva-1-1024x536.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"680\" height=\"356\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/221012-blogbeitrag-neuwahlen-in-berlin-canva-1-1024x536.png 1024w, https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/221012-blogbeitrag-neuwahlen-in-berlin-canva-1-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/221012-blogbeitrag-neuwahlen-in-berlin-canva-1-768x402.png 768w, https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/221012-blogbeitrag-neuwahlen-in-berlin-canva-1.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px\" \/>\n<p><strong>Background <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The last elections for the German Bundestag and the Berlin House of Representatives went anything but smoothly in the capital city. The reasons for this were faulty or missing electoral rolls, the insufficient number of election officials, the temporary closure of polling stations and overall long waiting times before casting one\u2019s vote \u2013 if one had made it there at all despite the road blockings due to the Berlin Marathon taking place on the same day. Given the inadequate conditions, politicians and the public are now discussing the possibility of new elections. But what does that actually mean?\u202fAnd how would we get there?<\/p>\n<p><strong>New elections = new elections?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Federal Election Act (BWG) distinguishes between <strong>a new election, a by-election and a re-election<\/strong>. A new election would be the consequence of an early termination of the legislative period, i.e., the dissolution of the Bundestag by the Federal President. The Basic Law (Grundgesetz) provides for this in two cases: If the Federal Chancellor is not elected by an absolute majority of the members of the Bundestag (Grundgesetz, \u00a763 paragraph 4) or, if a motion by the Federal Chancellor to express confidence in him or her does not receive the support of the majority of the members of the Bundestag (Grundgesetz, \u00a763). In the event of a dissolution of the Bundestag, a new election must be held within sixty days (BWG \u00a739 paragraph 2). When a new election was held, the new Bundestag shall convene after thirty days at the latest (BWG \u00a739 paragraph 2). According to the Federal Election Act, a new election corresponds to a \u201cregular\u201d Bundestag election yet with shortened deadlines. Eligible voters must therefore be entered in the electoral rolls as in the regular election. A postal vote must also be applied for again.<\/p>\n<p>A by-election is held only if the main election could not be carried out in a constituency or electoral district or if a constituency candidate dies \u2013 after the district election proposal has been approved by the administration but before the election was actually held (BWG \u00a743 paragraph 1) \u2013 as was the case in Dresden in 2005. In the first scenario, the by-election should take place no later than three weeks after the main election, and in the second scenario no later than six weeks after the main election.<\/p>\n<p>Both a new election and a by-election can thus be ruled out as a consequence for the Berlin election chaos of September 26, 2021. For this, however, a re-election could be ordered. For this will take place if the election is declared wholly or partially invalid in the election verification procedure (BWG \u00a744 paragraph 1). To this end, the Committee for the Scrutiny of Elections, Immunity and the Rules of Procedure must make a corresponding recommendation, which must be adopted by the plenary of the Bundestag.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The way to the re-election\u202f<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On September 8, 2022, the Election Scrutiny Committee of the German Bundestag deliberated on the resolution recommendation on the objection of the\u00a0Federal Returning Officer\u00a0and on the Berlin election. The specific results of the deliberations have not been made public to date. The vote of the plenary on the resolution recommendation is scheduled for this month (October) but only after the results of the deliberation of the Berlin Constitutional Court on a possible re-election of the Berlin House of Representatives.<\/p>\n<p>On September 28, Berlin\u2019s highest court concluded a preliminary assessment that the election errors were mandate-relevant, i.e., had an impact on the composition of parliament and the distribution of mandates. Only a complete re-election could thus restore a constitutional state of affairs. This assessment by the Berlin Constitutional Court now also affects the legal evaluation of the Bundestag election: The decision on the re-election of the German Bundestag was originally scheduled to be made on Thursday, September 29, in the Election Scrutiny Committee, but will now be postponed in response to the assessment of the Berlin Constitutional Court.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Features of a re-election\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If, at the time of the decision of the election review procedure, six months have not yet elapsed since the main election, an election shall be repeated in accordance with the same regulations, election proposals and electoral rolls (BWG \u00a783 paragraph 2). If the election is repeated only in individual electoral districts before the expiry of these six months, eligible voters may take part in the election if they have casted their main election ballot in the electoral districts for which the election is repeated. People who have since moved away from the area will have their ballot returned upon request with a note of validity for the re-election (BWO \u00a783 paragraph 4 &amp; 5).<\/p>\n<p>As more than six months have now passed since the main election, deviations in organisation and implementation can be expected. If the re-election takes place only in individual electoral districts, however, the delimitation of these may not be changed (BWO \u00a783 paragraph 2). Election proposals may only be changed if this results from the election verification decision or if a candidate has died or is no longer eligible.<\/p>\n<p>Ballot papers may only be issued by municipalities in the area in which the re-election takes place. Voters who have lost their right to vote since the main election are to be removed from the election roll.<\/p>\n<p>The re-election must take place no later than sixty days after the decision declaring the main election invalid has become final (BWG \u00a744 Paragraph 3). Assuming that the plenary passes a resolution for a re-election in one of the two sitting weeks in October (calendar week 41 or 42), the re-election would therefore have to take place in mid-December of this year in accordance with the Federal Election Act.<\/p>\n<p>The exact date of the re-election is to be determined by the Federal Returning Officer. This office was taken over on October 1, 2022 by political and administrative scientist Stephan Br\u00f6chler, who was appointed by the Berlin Senate on September 6, 2022. He thus replaces Ulrike Rockmann, who had already expressed her wish to step down from the honorary office at the beginning of the year.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Deductions from the procedure<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What are the implications of a potential re-election of the German Bundestag in Berlin?<\/p>\n<p>According to media coverage, a partial re-election of the Bundestag is under discussion in 440 of Berlin\u2019s 2,257 polling stations. This would affect all twelve districts, especially Pankow, Mitte and Reinickendorf. However, the election would presumably \u2013 apart from Reinickendorf \u2013 be limited to the second vote. There Monika Gr\u00fctters had prevailed with only 1,788 votes against the SPD candidate Torsten Einstmann.\u202fThis is therefore the only constituency that could hang in the balance.<\/p>\n<p>A re-election of the Bundestag as it is\u00a0currently being discussed\u00a0\u2013\u00a0condensed to Berlin as a federal state and to particular polling stations \u2013\u00a0is unlikely to have much impact on the distribution of majorities in the Bundestag, as the shift in second votes is unlikely to be particularly large: Just under 1.85 million \u2018Berliners\u2019 voted in the last Bundestag election, and of those, another 20 percent would vote again \u2013 that is, about 370,000, which is just 0.8 percent of the people who voted in the 2021 Bundestag election as a whole.<\/p>\n<p>However, the re-election could have very concrete personnel effects: A shift in the second votes could mean the end of the term for some members of the Bundestag who were elected via their parties\u2019 state lists. The latest election polls already show a change in mood compared with the last election: The Greens and CDU\/CSU are gaining in approval ratings at the expense of the SPD and FDP. However, it will not be possible to accurately estimate which members of parliament will lose their seats until the extent of the re-election has been determined by the Election Scrutiny Committee.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Background The last elections for the German Bundestag and the Berlin House of Representatives went anything but smoothly in the capital city. The reasons for this were faulty or missing electoral rolls, the insufficient number of election officials, the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4034"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4037,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4034\/revisions\/4037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bernstein-group.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}